Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don't Tell Mama (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  bibliomaniac 1  5  19:18, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Don't Tell Mama (novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Second proposed deletion, now through AFD. The article still fails WP:NB. All the references were previously primary sources/self-published. Now the page creator has updated the article with three secondary sources, one from Bulgarian National Radio website and two from HUGE.BG. The latter of which likely fails WP:RS. I'll remind again that this same page was created on Bulgarian Wikipedia (see bg:Не казвай на мама) and was speedy deleted for similar reasons (sources / advertisting). I do not believe the article can be improved to meet WP:NB. I grieve in stereo (talk) 18:16, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:01, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:01, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft delete as it has been dePRODded previously

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 14:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MrClog (talk) 20:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. The Bulgarian National Radio piece is substantial coverage in what I assume is a reliable source, but that's only one source. The HUGE.bg piece is an interview and the article cites nothing else that establishes notability.  Sandstein   21:58, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Only 1 clear RS and no other evidence of notability. Oddly enough, the promotional stunt of re-creating the painting may be more notable than the book it was promoting.  Either way, this fails on WP:SIGCOV. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:14, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree with the above arguments. The book simply doesn't appear to be really notable. The Bulgarian National Radio piece is nice and all, but that's not enough to build a whole page on, I think. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 07:53, 19 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.