Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don't Worry Yaara


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No prejudice against recreation once notability is established. The Bushranger One ping only 07:41, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Don't Worry Yara

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It is an upcoming movie, but no date of release or any reference provided. Fails notability guidelines at WP:FILM as there is not any significant media coverage. To me appears as a work of someone directly related the production and this page is created merely to promote the movie. Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 04:53, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:00, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:00, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: this article has been renamed to Don't Worry Yara. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Nom seems premature. There is quite a bit of coverage out there and from what I can tell the film will be released September 20. It includes notable participants. I don't see how deleting it now improves the encyclopedia. If for some reason it is cancelled that might be a different matter. Candleabracadabra (talk) 16:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Having notable participants does not mean notability for the film. Whatever coverage it has, is in few website very close to the area (Puhjabi films related sites). There is no independent coverage in the reliable newspapers.-- Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 03:02, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Aren't sites covering Punjabi films exactly where we would to expect to find coverage of a Punjabi film? I don't see the utility in deleting a movie that is headed for imminent release and has every indication of being fairly notable. I would rather see it deleted later on if it doesn't materialize, which seems highly unlikely at this point. The article is off to a decent start, let's see what develops. It will be hard for the article to be improved if it's deleted. Candleabracadabra (talk) 04:07, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I am not questing the article quality or if it can or can not be improved. I have not nominated because article is not properly written. I doubt if the movie is really notable per WP:MOVIE. The punjabi films sites, IMO, while can be used to get information about a movie, those can not be used to establish notability. They are more like Punjabi version of IMDb. They report or have pages for almost all the under production movies, which does not make all those movies notable. See this case, where a movie was send into article incubator until it was released and became notable. I do not have problem in recreating the article when the movie becomes notable in future.-- Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ  04:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Also I will like to point that you should not have moved the article while it is on AfD. I noticed on your talk page that you moved another article during AfD. Per WP:NOMOVE, do not do it in the future.-- Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 04:55, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - Actually, the rule about moving articles while they're at AfD has been modified. At WP:EDITATAFD, part of the Guide to deletion information page it states "Moving the article while it is being discussed can produce confusion. If you do this, please note it on the deletion discussion page, preferably both at the top of the discussion (for new participants) and as a new comment at the bottom (for the benefit of the closing administrator)." Northamerica1000(talk) 05:55, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks NorthAmerica for pointing out the new modified rule.-- Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 06:01, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  18:25, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  08:24, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:FUTURE - we're not a crystal ball, one individual on the cast has a wiki page. It appears to fail WP:FILM as User:Vigyani said. If the film becomes notable the perhaps a page can be started, but as of now the one person that has a page could have it listed under their works.  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 17:20, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. If the subject becomes notable or comes to fruition, its content should be recreated. Eduemoni<sup style='color:green'>↑talk↓ </b> 20:38, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.