Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don't worry if your job is small


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 22:48, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Don't worry if your job is small

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable source available to attribute this poem to any one person, or to verify the author's claim of alteration from the original. Without any sources to call on, all we have is a brief nugget with anonymous attribution. Appropriate for WikiQuote, perhaps, but not for the encyclopedia. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment. This does seem more suitable to WikiQuote.  However, there are indications that this may actually be notable:, , , .  I think more research is necessary. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 27 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment It is well-known, and oft-quoted. But WP:N means something different: the poem would have to have been the subject of independent coverage. I.e. not just quoted, but someone actually taking the time to write an article about the poem: analysis, historical significance, possible authorship, things like that. As it is, all we have is a poem, with no context.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:11, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  16:39, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete There is no meaningful content on the page, just the rhyme itself. --Gccwang (talk) 22:26, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:12, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. It looks like either nobody wants to do the requisite research or they can't find any better sources than me.  I guess I'll go with deletion.  It can always be recreated later if better sources are found. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:17, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete' Not enough reliable sources regarding the poem.-- danntm T C 17:21, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. No indication of reliable sources. —Swpbtalk 15:23, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - I cannot find the necessary coverage to meet WP:GNG that, in addition to failing the notability threshold, means that sufficient material has not been found to write a worthwhile article. More fundamentally, such text as there is fails WP:V, that is policy. For example, most sources e.g. this, do not attribute the poem. The Whispering Wind (talk) 22:34, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.