Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don 2 - The Chase Continues


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:10, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Don 2 - The Chase Continues

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

The Film is Not yet to be conform Pyaara Dil (talk) 20:52, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- Abecedare (talk) 21:20, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- Abecedare (talk) 21:20, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Changed to Keep: I found and, but I don't think that it is enough. Joe Chill (talk) 22:14, 5 December 2009 (UTC) Per Schmidt. Joe Chill (talk) 01:55, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I found more than Joe Chill and have begun improving the article. Film has received extensive coverage in sources to meet requirements of WP:GNG. IE: "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article.". That the film is yet to be made does not take away from the still-growing coverage, as the subject meets the requirements of WP:CRYSTAL: "All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred. It is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur, if discussion is properly referenced."  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:53, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep based on improvements, the news sources seem like legitimate coverage to me.  D r e a m Focus  22:19, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per sourcing and improvements by User:MichaelQSchmidt (we perhaps need a template and shortcut for this keep reasoning :-) ). Abecedare (talk) 17:48, 7 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep: per Abecedare and Dream. Real upcoming film. --Ragib (talk) 23:27, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:MQS which shouldn't be a redlink and also per WP:GNG. - Spaceman  Spiff  20:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.