Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Aslett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein.) North America1000 08:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Don Aslett

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Aslett owns a local cleaning service in Pocatlello, Idaho. He also has written books about cleaning. When your books have to be sourced to a libarry catalogue instead of reviews, that is suggesting not really notable. Most of the sources listed here are his websites or connected to his publishers. My search for additional sources was not very helpful. I came up with sources showing his comapny leasing space in Idaho and that was about it, and an article written by someone of the same name in a southern Idaho paper, but that looked to be by someone else, unless some of the detials of his education here are wrong. John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:33, 22 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment  I find 136 items in HighBeam Research. Some of them are news wires, but there are a lot of magazine and newspaper articles. (I filtered by magazine and newspaper publication types and got 132 items, but some of those are still news wires.) What do you think? I am happy to work on this article, if you those sources might make it a viable article. -- CaroleHenson (talk) 00:37, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:41, 6 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.