Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Donovan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:08, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Don Donovan
Vanity creation of. Does not meet WP:BIO. Note that he is not the author of notable books but something closer to souvenir books. Google gets 284 unique hits for "Don donovan" + "new zealand" not that bad but not a whole lot either and going through the links I could not find evidence of significant third party coverage which means that the article's content is most likely to remain unverifiable. Pascal.Tesson 04:37, 9 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment It seems like it's borderline. The article needs work, for sure, but it's hard to tell how notable those publications are. Any Kiwis know anything? --GumbyProf: &quot;I&#39;m about ideas, but I&#39;m not always about good ideas.&quot; 05:21, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 05:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO. A Google News Archive search for "Don Donovan" comes up with one relevant hit from New Zealand Marketing Magazine see Capitalistroadster 00:44, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions.   -- Capitalistroadster 00:44, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:AUTO. Danny Lilithborne 01:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, published author, "One Man's heart attack" and "New Zealand Odyssey" are available in Auckland public libraries.-gadfium 01:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly an autobiography. If he is notable someone else would write him up, and it seems clear he is not. Seldumonde 17:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly an autobiography. If he is notable someone else would write him up, and it seems clear he is not. Seldumonde 17:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.