Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don G. Giunta Middle School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.-- Wizardman 04:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Don G. Giunta Middle School

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable middle school, one of over a hundred middle and elementary school stubs put up by the editor over 14 months ago, very few of which have ever been improved. There have been zero substantive edits (other than mentioning that the fellow after whom the school was named was now deceased) since February 2006 save for repeated and frequent vandalism, which has become endemic in the last two weeks. Article was prodded three days ago, but prod was removed by an anon IP without comment or reasoning. Fails WP:ATT and WP:NN, no real prospect of the article ever being sourced or improved.  Ravenswing  03:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 'Delete No assertion of notability, stub for over a year (and a 2 sentence stub at that). Should be speedy delete, but people seem to complain when a speedy tag is put on any school article. TJ Spyke 03:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions.  -- Noroton 05:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no assertion of notability. Nacon kantari  05:38, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I tried looking for an article to merge this into, but on second thought, there's hardly anything to merge even if there was something to merge with. And it is a vandal magnet. I've reported the IP address to admins (absolutely nothing comes from that address except vandalism, apparently it's a computer in the public schools in that district). If anyone invests time and effort into creating a good article here, that editor will have to be around to watch it or see it destroyed by vandals. Not worth it in my book. Noroton 05:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Butseriouslyfolks 06:16, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - School does not appear notable enough for its own article. Any notability it has should be in a school district article, if one is ever created. Camaron1 | Chris  11:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with the reasons already given; it's not notable on its own. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 23:16, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Dpbsmith (talk) 00:20, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per nom and 150 middle school stubs by user Ttttrrrreeeeyyyyyy 01:42, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete but Instead of doing these deletions, why don't we organize to do merges instead. it would save a good deal of work. I started today with the middle schools in School District 43 Coquitlam near Vancouver . If each of us sharing this opinion did one district a week, we would slowly get the people who want to keep[ such articles to either join us or upgrade. DGG 09:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I think we'd save even more time by putting together a policy that might prevent these articles from being created in the first place. That way the creators would know they should be putting their energies elsewhere. Noroton 23:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * If DGG will suggest a school district, I'll help out with it. Will anyone else join us? Noroton 17:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable institution. Piccadilly 11:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.