Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Mason (immunologist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 15:27, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Don Mason (immunologist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability; no significant coverage of the subject identified in reliable sources. — swpb T 12:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — swpb T 12:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — swpb T 12:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:16, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:17, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Passes WP:Prof with over 20 papers with over 100 cites. Nominator is reminded of WP:Before. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC).
 * Keep. He may not be the most highly-cited Oxford immunologist named D. Mason (try looking up David Y. Mason) but searching Google scholar for author:dw-mason matches the numbers given by Xxan and bears out a clear pass of WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - professor at a prominent research facility. Article may require a trim but notability not in doubt. I've been able to add a citation for his retirement date. Blythwood (talk) 12:12, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.