Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Moody


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. I feel that relisting a third time is not a suitable action - there is obviously no consensus to delete here!  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 04:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Don Moody

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I can't find reliable sources which are independent of the subject to show that he meets the notability criteria. My understanding is the the BusinessWeek profiles information are submitted by the person/company involved. All the links I could find were to PR sites or social media sites, nothing independent.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 22:53, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

"Keep I can't find a way on BusinessWeek to add or edit any company information, leading me to believe that BusinessWeek gathered and added the information on their own. I will continue to seek additional reliable sources to bring validation to the article. Transatlanick (talk) 02:27, 11 December 2011 (UTC)"

"Additional reliable sources, independent of the subject prove that he meets the notability criteria. Please keep the article, or continue to assist me in improving it. Thank you! Transatlanick (talk) 02:41, 11 December 2011 (UTC)"
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 11 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 23:26, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 00:48, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

 "The Emmy for Outstanding Achievement in Main Title Design is in fact in Don Moody's name. This makes him eligible under WP:ANYBIO Transatlanick (talk) 17:15, 25 December 2011 (UTC)."
 * Merge and redirect to WordWorld. If the Emmys had been his alone, I'd say keep, but they're both shared, and he's only really known for the TV program. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:42, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * IMDb says it was shared with three others. In any case, it hardly qualifies as a "well-known and significant award or honor". Clarityfiend (talk) 04:00, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * How does a well-known and notable award becomes less well-known or significant if it is shared by others? As any such award is given in recognition of creative efforts, you offer a conundrum. When a notable organization wishes to recognize and award creativity, they award those reponsible. An award is not neccessarily diuted if shared. Or would an Academy Award become less well-known or significant if it is shared?  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:31, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Well-known? Outstanding Achievement in Main Title Design? Clarityfiend (talk) 03:02, 2 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 01:35, 2 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.