Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Schieferdecker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 22:42, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Don Schieferdecker

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Violates WP:BLP1E Shearonink (talk) 17:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - could be considered an attack page, but particularly, violates WP:NOTNEWS.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 23:02, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, sooner rather than later. --bender235 (talk) 23:56, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Extremely Baised article, would be difficult to rewrite encyclopediatically. Also a WP:BLP1E problem.  ~  Matthewrbowker  Say hi! 04:19, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lacks WP:NPOV, also the article is deeply emerged into biased information, not to mention the 1 Event problem. Eduemoni↑talk↓  15:29, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:BLP1E and by close similarity to the example at Coatrack of what constitutes a coatrack Attack page. Page still shows its roots as as a blatant attack page by a single purpose account with someone with an axe to grind, apparently to do with gay rights.  Such pages violate policy. --Closeapple (talk) 11:32, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.