Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Shelley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  11:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Don Shelley

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable cricketer, fails WP:NCRIC as per Cricinfo profile. No significant coverage in reliable sources, fails WP:SIGCOV. &mdash;  A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 11:31, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  A.A Prinon   Leave a dialogue 11:31, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  A.A Prinon   Leave a dialogue 11:31, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  A.A Prinon   Leave a dialogue 11:31, 14 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete County cricket scorers don't tend to be notable enough for their own articles. Middlesex's scorers are listed on the Middlesex page, however on another recent discussion it seems that deletion is more appropriate than redirect, as its excessive detail for them to be listed on the page. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 15:30, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wholly non-notable in the context of a global encyclopaedia; I accept now that I probably was wrong even to propose a redirect in that other case.  RobinCarmody (talk) 22:01, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom. StickyWicket (talk) 22:46, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete assuming that Middlesex's scorers are removed from that page, otherwise redirect to Middlesex County Cricket Club. Either way, no need for an article on someone who will never pass WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:17, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete County cricket scorers aren't notable as a result of having that job themselves. Blue Square Thing (talk) 11:59, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - I would fully concur with the arguments made above. Dunarc (talk) 22:41, 19 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.