Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Aamodt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Donald Aamodt

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable, only one very minor source lists accomplishments--Daviddavey (talk) 03:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * The SFWA lists his publications too and I wouldn't call that a minor source. - Mgm|(talk) 09:33, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Every book or comic that falls within the science fiction category is listed. No major source has a two paragraph reference to him as per WP:BIO--Daviddavey (talk) 00:46, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 1 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Dr. Locarno (talk) 00:20, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Could you explain your logic? A keep vote means very little without reasoning behind it. Thanks! D ARTH P ANDA duel 00:55, 1 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   -- VG &#x260E; 03:42, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.   -- VG &#x260E; 03:42, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as while I found a couple of useful reviews for his books from one source, I could find nothing on the author and merely being a paid member of the WFC is in no way a signifier of notability. - Dravecky (talk) 04:17, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   Sandstein   21:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - Author fails WP:Bio and WP:CREATIVE. Two small books is not a significant body of work. And the search so far only finds the two brief reviews listed in the article (neither of which is positive). Author lacks significant coverage to pass criteria. — Cactus Writer |   needles  21:49, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: SFWA lists MY publications, and I've a great deal more than two. What part of WP:BIO does this person fulfill?   Ravenswing  17:44, 7 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.