Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Alasky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. --Ryan Delaney talk 06:56, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

Donald Alasky
Marked for speedy deletion as being a hoax. No vote. --fvw *  01:31, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete / Speedy. No mention of this guy anywhere outside WP, which is puzzling considering he is claimed to be an Oscar winner, no less. Probably wishful thinking on someone's part. Owen&times; &#9742;  01:55, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Abstain, umm... if there is no evidence for him really being the creator of Mr. Game & Watch then delete... but, if he did then definite keep. Someone with Nintendo games want to look at the credits? gren グレン 02:09, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. How could a successful video game developer not show up on google at all?  Occam's razor suggests hoax. Chick Bowen 03:14, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete apparent hoax. Dlyons493 03:18, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete hoax. If he did develop the character it should be mentioned in the article on the character. And since game character developers don't win Oscars (and usually show up in Google searches, I'm quite confident in saying this is a hoax. - Mgm|(talk) 10:23, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete We can't even confirm the exsistence of the supposed cartoon Mr. Game & Watch exsisted in. I also don't belive anyone "created" him; he's a fairly generic character, sort of resembling a plump stick figure with a large nose. -- gakon5 (talk)
 * Delete unverifiable/nn video game developer. Andrew pmk | Talk 23:02, 25 September 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.