Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Attig


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Deletion concerns appear to have been addressed. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  17:46, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Donald Attig

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Selfpromo Night of the Big Wind  talk  18:18, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 29 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  15:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)




 * Keep — It's rare to see an article with 39 references at AfD... Probably half the references in the article do nothing to establish his notability, but the other half make a strong argument for notability. They're all offline, so we have to AGF here, but this one passes the N-test for me.  The article is a mess and would be better off with a complete overhaul, but it's not a deletion.  Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 15:30, 6 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - It certainly requires some extensive edits to improve its quality and to resolve its outstanding issues, but it, at the very least, appears to satisfy the general notability criteria and is not an obvious case of pure promotion. Rorshacma (talk) 22:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:54, 14 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisting comment. I almost closed this as "keep" but being a BLP, I think a few more comments would be helpful. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.