Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Blair


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:56, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Donald Blair
Delete. Non-notable candidate for city councillor in 2006 Toronto municipal elections. Fails to meet WP:BIO criteria. Atrian 02:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete City-council membership by itself in not encyclopedic enough to warrant inclusion. Just being a candidate for said council even less so. The other accomplishments are not enough to add to the subject's notability. --DarkAudit 02:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per above, I'm sure we wish him well, but being a candidate is a relatively common experience.  Geogre 02:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It's unnecessary for every aspiring politician on the planet to be included here. Fails WP:BIO. —  NM  Chico  24  [[Image:Flag of New Mexico.svg|25px]] 02:34, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and my comments on Afd:Chris Reid. &mdash; MrDolomite | Talk 03:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Gogo Dodo 04:08, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with DarkAudit YUL89YYZ 17:47, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. --Skeezix1000 18:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. --Gekedo 18:58, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Retain I think all challengers should be considered noteworthy. If they lose the election and do nothing else considered relevant, then their pages may be thrown into the trash heap of history. Juveboy 01:09, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per A7. Spam/vanity. -- Aguerriero  ( talk ) 21:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. rootology 06:16, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Juveboy. To hell with WP:BIO Attic Owl 01:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.