Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Covington


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep - Yomangani talk 13:02, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Donald Covington
Contested PROD. Yank sox 01:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Non notable character, similar to the doctor, in yesterdays aFD scope_creep 02:16, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete How does teaching courses in the history of architecture and design make you notable? WikiBot 04:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete-Per above.--SUI T 42 04:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Being a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts is often a sign of notability, and I added bibliographic information about a book he wrote. On the other hand, this seems to have been the only book that he wrote. I wasn't able to find out much about him. A google search for covington site:thersa.org didn't yield any results. He seems to have retired in 1992 according to this reference, which could explain some of the difficulty finding verifiable references. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 06:41, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. --Howrealisreal 13:49, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, I do see this person asserting some notability, looks notable. --Ter e nce Ong (C 14:04, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep A full professor at a major university is about at the threshold for sufficient notability, but I would expect him to be an editor of major journals, to have a long list of publications and textbooks written, to have received awards to have designed important structures, and to have had notable students. The material is probably there, but I expect the editor creating the article just worked from one minimal source.Edison 16:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep- Being a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts is often a sign of notability as TruthbringerToronto commented. Nileena joseph 13:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, per TruthbringerToronto. bbx 05:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per the above.  ALKIVAR &trade; &#x2622; 05:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.