Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald M. Rawson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.-- Wizardman 12:52, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Donald M. Rawson

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject is non-notable per WP:PROF Mwelch 03:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. A non-notable professor. Entire content of article is original research: the article author's personal interview with the subject, the author's former professor.  Mwelch 03:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.  -- Pete.Hurd 03:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Accomplishment is not notability. --Dhartung | Talk 05:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Not notable as an academic researcher, possibly asa teacher, but how can we judge?DGG 07:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mwelch and Dhartung said it well. DoorsAjar 07:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. I've come to the conclusion that if you've ever spent more than ten minutes with this author, he'll write an article about you. He has a history of writing about non-notable or barely notable subjects. It probably taints my view of articles he's authored, but so be it. Realkyhick 03:12, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.