Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donationcoin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 15:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Donationcoin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

As with the other two articles created by this editor for very similar subjects Guldencoin and Sterlingcoin I really am not seeing anything on a quick search to evidence that they are notable subjects.. All three articles are extremely promotional, unsourced, and read like PR/conflict of interest copy promoting these very new digital currencies. Although not hard evidence I was surprised that Google Search's autocomplete function didn't recognise any of the three terms at the time I nominated these (this may change as people start searching for them, but as signs go that doesn't look good.)

At best it seems far too soon. Mabalu (talk) 01:40, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * delete. no evidence of notability. -No.Altenmann >t 05:23, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sign of notability, this form of digital currency is not widely used (yet). As per Mabalu, WP:TOOSOON.  George.Edward.C –  Talk  –  Contributions  10:40, 27 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 27 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete This entry has been covered are adequately covered in Cryptocurrency, if this entry was of merit it would be listed there.Lfrankbalm (talk) 18:55, 27 October 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lfrankbalm (talk • contribs)
 * Delete Per Lfrankbalm above --Jersey92 (talk) 15:52, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete but permit recreation if/when it gets notable. Not even a single source in the article anywho. Tutelary (talk) 22:58, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.