Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Done In 60 Seconds Award


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 00:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Done In 60 Seconds Award

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable award referenced by entirely primary sources. RadioFan (talk) 21:45, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  21:47, 17 September 2014 (UTC)


 * With just a simple google search and without spending time going over the results:
 * http://www.theguardian.com/film/video/2013/mar/26/done-in-60-seconds-blade-runner-video
 * http://www.heyuguys.com/empire-done-60-seconds-2014-short-film-competition-report/
 * http://www.thehollywoodnews.com/2013/03/06/jameson-empire-done-in-60-seconds-uk-finalists-announced/
 * http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newsvideo/weirdnewsvideo/7265123/Done-in-60-seconds-Top-Gun.html
 * Aside from that, its one of the active rewards from the Empire Rewards. Adding this information to the Empire Awards article page would just clutter it up and removing it all together makes no sense. I fail to see your reasoning of removing an award page from an established award ceremony.
 * Side note: I don't live in the UK and where i live the local Done in 60 Seconds competition was widely known with amateur film makers. --Gonnym (talk) 22:03, 17 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Per sources provided by Gonnym. Dcfc1988 (talk) 23:14, 21 September 2014 (UTC)




 * Keep I agree that topic notability has been established. Appropriate under WP:SALAT and, suitable under WP:LISTN, this would overburden Empire Awards.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 03:14, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.