Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dong Zhao (Kuomintang)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 02:55, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Dong Zhao (Kuomintang)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: as non-notable (WP:MILITARY) Quis separabit?  03:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand with reference to zh:董釗, having a complete history section decently sourced to multiple print books. zhwp also writes of having significant roles in the Second Sino-Japanese War and would satisfy #3 and #5 of WP:SOLDIER.  野狼院ひさし  u/t/c 07:00, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as a general per WP:SOLDIER. Chinese and Japanese Wikipedias give much more information about him. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Would someone add the Japanese and Chinese foreign language transclusion templates for me? I don't know how. Thanks. Quis separabit?  19:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Having held a sub-national office is enough for WP:NPOL.Antigng (talk) 05:18, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per Special Notability Guideline Military-People#3 (held rank of General). Carrite (talk) 15:15, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.