Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dongling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. NAC. Joe Chill (talk) 20:54, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Dongling

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Vanity page. No third party coverage that I could find. Perhaps chinese sources exists. Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 18:39, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

here is a online source from China's Xinhua News Agency about Dongling making the world's largest electro dymanic shaker in 2007. http://www.js.xinhuanet.com/xin_wen_zhong_xin/2007-01/12/content_9030988.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.224.132.203 (talk) 06:20, 26 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:54, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:24, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a company specializing in manufacturing vibration test equipment.  Their wares may be important for testing vehicle and other engines; but the customer base for anything like that is going to be pretty  small and specialized, and as such reviewed only in "media of limited interest and circulation" if at all. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 21:48, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I just added some reliable sources (including Xinhuanet and People's Daily Online) to prove its notability. --Pengyanan (talk) 10:34, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looking (with the assistance of Google translate) at the references added to the page by Pengyanan leaves no doubt as the the notability of this company. J04n(talk page) 00:29, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. The article needs work.  It needs cleanup and more sourcing.  It does not look like it was created by someone whose native language is English.  But taking its claims as true, the subject is a good-sized company that is a significant supplier to China's manned space program.  That meet the notability threshold for me.  It should probably be renamed to "Dongling Vibration" or "Dongling Zhendong."  In all fairness to the nom, I would probably have gone with "Delete" in the state it was in when the nomination was made.  There was no assertion of any fact that screamed out "Notable!" to me at that point. TJRC (talk) 03:04, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.