Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donhee Ham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn nomination. Nominator (I.e. me) misunderstood NACADEMIC, and also forgot to check Google scholar. Trouts would be appropriate. (non-admin closure) Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 02:24, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Donhee Ham

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Seems to fail WP:NACADEMIC, and WP:GNG. A BEFORE search turned up a few published papers, and some passing mentions (in non-independent sources) as having worked on a single study involving rat neurons and "copy and paste" of neural connections. Everything else was non-independent, databases, or Wikipedia mirrors. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 16:06, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Technology, Computing,  and South Korea. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 16:06, 10 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @SJSJB: Pinging the most significant contributor to this article, besides the original author. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 16:11, 10 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep WP:SK3, miserable failure of WP:BEFORE. Named full professor at Harvard is an easy pass of WP:PROF, and his citation counts on Google Scholar of 924, 648, 479, 426, etc., are easily enough for #C1, as one would expect from someone with a named professorship at Harvard. Given that the named professorship at Harvard is almost the only thing the lead of this very short article says about the subject, it is hard to understand how the nominator can claim to have evaluated this article against WP:PROF and overlooked it. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:40, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per David Eppstein. Mccapra (talk) 21:37, 10 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.