Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donkey Kong Wii


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. BorgQueen 15:25, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Donkey Kong Wii

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Article provides no source of the game's existence. Jonny2x4 03:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The sources are there, and three of the four are reliable gaming sites. However, nobody seems to have too many details on the game yet.  But searches on different search-engines found some results.  The article does need work and if there are more details out there they need to be found, but for now I think it's alright.  Gan  fon  03:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions.   -- SkierRMH 03:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Recreation of content deleted at Articles for deletion/Donkey Kong (Wii). Nothing has changed since then. --- RockMFR 04:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - We can't examine the previous, deleted version to be sure, but from the previous nomination it would seem to indicate that the Donkey Kong (Wii) article was only sourced to the related Gamespot page. This has four sources, not one.  While notability might not have been proveable back in November, it is now. -- Y  &#124;  yukichigai (ramble argue check) 04:14, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * All four sources are still trivial and speculative. There is nothing substantial at any of them. --- RockMFR 04:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Upon further investigation, the IGN/GameStats links don't even refer to this game. They are pages for DK Bongo Blast, a completely different game. --- RockMFR 04:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Trivial and speculative outside sources are still outside sources so long as they are reliable. The fact that two of them aren't even about the right game is a good point though.  Article doesn't establish notability so well anymore. -- Y  &#124;  yukichigai (ramble argue check) 04:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Mostly Indifferent and Speedy Keep - I have no idea what the nominator was thinking, but the article provides not one but four sources which confirm to a relative degree of certainty that the game (or a plan to develop it) does exist. Meets WP:V, WP:RS, and (barely) WP:N. It may be stubby in nature, but most articles about upcoming games stay in stub form for a while. -- Y  &#124;  yukichigai (ramble argue check) 04:10, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm changing my opinion to Delete or Retarget to DK Bongo Blast per my above comments to RockMFR. -- Y  &#124;  yukichigai (ramble argue check) 04:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. I'm calling crystalballery just based on some of the arguments in this very AfD. --Dennisthe2 04:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * We're not ready for this. Delete per nom and Dennisthe2. Big  top  07:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOT a crystal ball. Terence Ong 12:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete; violates WP:CRYSTAL --Mhking 16:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 19:27, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's not WP:CRYSTAL because it's sourced. Sure, it's a stub and will stay a stub until more information is available, but the game still exists (or will exist, barring cancellation,) so what's the problem? -Ryanbomber 12:28, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Oops. Didn't notice that the sources were for a different game. -Ryanbomber 12:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep We got articles like W.I.T.C.H. (game)--User:NFAN3&#124;NFAN3 02:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.