Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donna Montegna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 11:46, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Donna Montegna

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability asserted by having a published book here, however the book itself appears to have never sold particularly well or been well known. I'm not sure simply having a book published covers notability guidelines. –– Lid(Talk) 11:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. One book, ranked below 3,000,000 on Amazon. Sorry, no. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:39, 18 April 2007 (UTC)


 * &emsp; Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  &emsp; Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:21, 24 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - if there's nothing else other than one book, which I haven't read. Has anyone? Just 179 ghits would suggest not. Moreschi Talk 17:15, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:V, WP:BIO, WP:BK.  If the book itself fails to pass WP:BK - and I didn't think the Amazon sales rankings GOT that low! - then an author whose sole assertion to notability comes from the book sure doesn't pass.    Ravenswing  19:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete – fails WP:BIO; her book doesn't appear to have attracted any press attention or reviews. — mholland (talk) 23:02, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - it fails WP:BIO and the book she has written is also not notable. — Wenli 23:02, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, did anyone else notice that her book is published by "Self Esteem Shop II" ? NawlinWiki 02:23, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This is a clear delete. Self-published book, vanity article. --Tony Sidaway 07:34, 26 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.