Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donnie Kennedy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. joe deckertalk to me 15:53, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Donnie Kennedy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable individual. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. No independent or reliable sources provided that focus directly on the individual. As one talk page user put it: "smells like a vanity article". Prod removed. William S. Saturn (talk) 07:03, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:38, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:40, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — -- Cirt (talk) 07:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per nom. No significant coverage, non-notable.--JayJasper (talk) 17:24, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. While as a figure in electoral politics he is insignificant, there are a number of sources that talk about his apparently influential role in the neo-Confederate/pro-slavery movement, especially as the co-author of The South Was Right!: these books, these news stories, this SPLC report. But I think this collection of dead-enders can be adequately mentioned in the League of the South and Neo-Confederate articles without needing bio's of each of them. Wasted Time R (talk) 00:57, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:POLITICIAN, WP:AUTHOR, and WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 08:16, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.