Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donorcommunity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:18, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Donorcommunity

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I am unable to locate significant reliable source coverage to establish notability per WP:GNG. There is a claim of notability in the article of, "It is the first SaaS company to provide multiple applications as a single solution with one database, cloud-based platform to NPOs." But I am unable to confirm the notability of that claim in any reliable sources as well. All I am able to locate is a single short Miami Herald article that makes reference to it winning the newspaper sponsored business plan competition. Appears to be too early for an article on Wiki.ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:51, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The majority of things I found press wise are just press releases. Appears to fail GNG. Sarah (talk) 16:47, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:35, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:35, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:35, 15 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per Sarah. The original version was blatant spam pasted from their website. The re-written version is far less promotional, but hasn't left much worth keeping: no assertion of notability per WP:Company; no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Scopecreep (talk) 19:22, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  GregJackP   Boomer!   12:28, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Like nom, I was unable to find significant covereage in WP:RS to establish notability. The bulk of what I found was press releases; as such, I feel the company fails WP:CORP, and it is WP:TOOSOON for a WP article. None but shining hours (talk) 19:26, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.