Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donut Pupusa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by User:HickoryOughtShirt?4 (Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria A7, G11). (non-admin closure) ☾Loriendrew☽   ☏(ring-ring)  23:08, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Donut Pupusa

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable dessert. Nothing coming up in WP:RS about this. Searches only coming up with primary sources or social media posts. See also related discussion at John Flores. Spiderone 15:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  15:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of El Salvador-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  15:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  15:37, 3 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete No sources to establish nobility. This should be CSD instead. 'Donut Pupusa' not a widely known food item. The article is wholly intended to promote the subject including AfD for Articles for deletion/John A. Flores. Creator of both the article likely to have CoI. RationalPuff (talk) 16:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Good faith search not coming up with notability. FWIW, I agree with the G11 tag on the article but I'm not comfortable with the A7 tag. Fabrictramp &#124;  talk to me  21:23, 3 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.