Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donvale Christian College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:09, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Donvale Christian College

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a secondary school does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRIT. The subject lacks multiple independent secondary sources providing significant coverage. Per WP:SIGCOV: ""Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail". Cited references are not independent of the subject. WP:BEFORE revealed only WP:ROUTINE coverage and not independent sources covering the topic directly and in detail.  // Timothy ::  talk  19:18, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  19:26, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  19:26, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:27, 9 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete I searched Google and JSTOR and could not find sources that satisfied WP:ORGCRIT or WP:GNG. As nom stated, this school does not have significant, independent coverage. Z1720 (talk) 21:17, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons already given about the lack of notability. Since I'm not seeing anything about it that would pass WP:ORGCRIT or WP:GNG either. Just trivial coverage of things that could apply to any college. Also, the article is extremely promotional in tone and would probably take a fundamental re-write not to be. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:53, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Promotional article about a non-notable subject. Spawnrec (talk) 03:04, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per Timothy, article lacks independent coverage, and is somewhat laudatory and promotional. Whiteguru (talk) 09:07, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, Not enough independant sources to meet notabiity. fails WP:ORGCRIT, Alex-h (talk) 07:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: per all of the above Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 13:37, 15 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.