Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donya Fiorentino


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:57, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Donya Fiorentino

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable per WP:BIO, WP:NACTOR and WP:CREATIVE. Per expired prod in 2009, WP:NOTINHERITED - neither the article itself nor the provided refs give any indication that this person is notable for anything other than her marriages. No significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources, apart from press mentions in articles about her former husbands. Captain Conundrum (talk) 08:07, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Captain Conundrum (talk) 08:13, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 12 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  19:11, 19 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - cannot see any evidence of notability.Deb (talk) 18:44, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete; while the subject's divorce from Gary Oldman appears to have received significant coverage from non-primary reliable sources, the subject of this AfD herself has not appeared to have receive significant coverage outside of the event of her divorce, therefore the subject appears to fall under WP:BLP1E. That being said the divorce itself does not appear to have received significant coverage past its completion, and thus the event does not warrant inclusion per WP:PERSISTENCE. Therefore, as no significant coverage of the subject of this AfD has yet to have been created, then I must support deletion of this article at this time, with no prejudice to recreating if such significant coverage is later created.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:00, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.