Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dooble


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:56, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Dooble

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable piece of software (notablility not asserted, and I can't find any good mention of it by Googling), only recently released as beta and not a single source other than its own webpage. Contested PROD with reasoning of "This is linked from the List_of_Web_Browsers page and should not be deleted. All alternative web browsers are notable and at minimum a link should be provided to the software's home page.", two arguments that correspond to circular reasoning at best (walled-garden at worst) and an assertion that is totally at odds with WP:N standards. DMacks (talk) 17:09, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not (yet) notable. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:31, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above arguments, and the fact that the article doesn't cite any Reliable sources to confirm the subject's notability.--Unscented (talk) 22:01, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The browser was created on September 8th, 2008 so it is extremely new. This pagew should be recreated when it reaches a milestonebeyond 0.01, and some third party review of the project. -- Aronzak (talk) 01:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:27, 19 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.