Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doodhnath Singh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Certainly per WP:SKCRIT #3, hopefully, of course, not #4 also. But perhaps, (for example) could give a second opinion upon that likelihood. (non-admin closure)  >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 14:36, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Doodhnath Singh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The Writer is not notable fails GNG and all references are about his death.Not a notable Hindi writer and has won no notable awardsOderwald (talk) 17:25, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 17:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 17:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 17:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 17:46, 13 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep - added for AfD by single purpose account. First ever edit. Suspicious. Anyway clearly notable and within WP:GNG. Article is in good shape overall with good references. The fact that most references stems from after his death is really irrelevant.BabbaQ (talk) 23:00, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:05, 14 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Agree with Gene93k. Third party references provided satisfies WP:GNG.  Hagennos (talk) 05:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, I am going to be generous and assume that this nomination is an error on the part of the nominator rather than an act of bad faith, but sources clearly demonstrate that this person meets the WP:GNG. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:19, 14 January 2018 (UTC).
 * Keep: The nominator says that all of the sources talk about the writer's death. Here are a few sources that provide significant coverage of the subject during his lifetime.

The first of these article was published when the subject's name was chosen for the Bharat Bharti Samman. Would a non-notable writer be chosen for this award? Meets WP:GNG. --Skr15081997 (talk) 12:06, 14 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.