Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doodle god


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Spartaz Humbug! 05:04, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Doodle god

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:GNG. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:09, 26 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  01:01, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No Google news hits. Also appears to be conflict of interest and self-promotional, as indicated here: . JNW (talk) 21:54, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * ,, are all reviews and the first two certainly seem reliable and independent (the third I'm less sure of). keep as it meets WP:N. Hobit (talk) 06:23, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I've tagged a couple of statements in the article as needing verifiable sourcing. If those are forthcoming, I'll probably go for keep. On a personal note, I do not play computer games (except FreeCell...) but I did enjoy the 'quotes' on the screenshots in the review I looked at. (No, I'm not basing any decision on that.) Peridon (talk) 13:41, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia does not offer free advertising space. SteveStrummer (talk) 20:12, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Weak Keep - Rock, Paper, Shotgun, Australian Gamer, AppAdvice, GameZebo, Gamers With Casts. Two of these at least are reliable to the best of my knowledge. SharkD   Talk  02:17, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep – per the sources found by Hobit and SharkD. –MuZemike 23:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.