Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doodlemail (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete CSD G6 - housekeeping, one of the two articles this page disambiguated has been deleted. Pegasus &laquo;C&brvbar;T&raquo; 11:21, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Doodlemail (disambiguation)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete Dab page that consists only of redlinks (and where the redlinks are unlikely to result in an article) Mayalld (talk) 08:53, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The first article has been created and it does not assert notability. I tagged it for speedy deletion and from the latest text written on this page, it does not appear the sectond article will be about a notable software program.  Jons63 (talk) 09:06, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

I do not know how 'speedily' deletion occurs so I am having to waste my time asking for these articles not be deleted before I have a chance to create them. You may be jaded wikipedia editors sick and tired of people creating pointless articles on their friend's aunt's pets, but Doodlemail the AT&T program is used by many people, as is the Doodlemail.co.uk email service. They are valid articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Doodlemail (talk • contribs) 09:09, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete lack of content (dab pages with less than 3 entries as I understand it fall under this somewhere). No prejudice against the creation of individual pages for these 2 subjects as long as the resulting articles conform to our policies and guidelines for notability and  verifiability. Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:14, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This page will not be necessary once both are redlinks, which should be happening any time now. Movingboxes (talk) 09:15, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.