Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doom Guard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. ➔ REDVEЯS would like to show you some puppies 22:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Doom Guard

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article has zero notability, no references, and is duplicative with the character section of the video game from which it came. Judgesurreal777 23:35, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions.   —Quasirandom 00:54, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per WP:FICT into List of Warcraft characters (which itself probably needs to be split by the alphabet into four or five articles, but that's a cleanup issue). The guard doesn't seem to have enough independent notability to warrant a separate article, in the way that the characters as a whole do. —Quasirandom 00:56, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per Quasirandom. Rray 23:49, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge. No out-of-universe perspective, no real-world notabiliy.  Pagra shtak  16:08, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions.  Pagra shtak  16:08, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - In-game statistics (WP:NOT) and lack of out-of-universe context (WP:WAF). Marasmusine 16:37, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources, no out of universe info and unlikely that there will be some. Merge seems inappropriate, the article labels the Doomguard as a type of enemy rather than an individual character.Someone another (talk) 15:23, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree that WP:NOT and WP:WAF direct us to delete the article and reading the L:ist of characters I also do not feel that a merge is correct. SorryGuy 20:14, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.