Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doom Troopers

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. ugen 64 23:42, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Doom Troopers
Non-notable. No info on the game itself, only that it is not Doom. -- Scott ei&#960;  03:51, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC) Keep new version. -- Scott ei&#960;  05:27, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, but definitely cleanup + expand. Gets 4,330 Google hits, and at least the top ten aren't false.-LtNOWIS 04:22, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep most games for SNES, unless they are extremely obscure. DaveTheRed 05:25, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, concur with above. Kappa 11:33, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not encyclopaedic. Megan1967 07:31, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not enough content to merit an article at this point. Tygar 09:40, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, the article admits that it's an extremely obscure game. Radiant! 12:31, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obscure game + no content = pointless article. - NormanEinstein 15:55, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. -- R yan!  |  Talk  19:21, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Concur with Einstein. Also the sentence "It is unclear whether ID software sued the makers of this game" is awful. "Something interesting might have happened regarding this, but I'm not sure if it did" is not the sort of thing you want in an encyclopedia article. No vote at present, but leaning a bit towards keep. -R. fiend 21:34, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not much of an article here. Wyss 01:20, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, another one from User:SamuraiClinton. Rhobite 03:05, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Much better, keep. Rhobite 04:41, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - I cleaned up the stub considerably. Now at least it's a viable video game stub. DaveTheRed 04:12, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non notable info. ComCat 09:21, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's okay now.  --A D Monroe III 23:25, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.