Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Door to door storage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 09:29, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Door to door storage
Non-notable company, unreferenced. Stifle 12:36, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Woo, look at all those templates. Delete Chris talk back 12:38, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - 68,700 is good enough for me Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 12:41, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand: I've heard of the company before. But the article is an horrendous stub which does nothing to describe either the company or what it does.  (Instead of sendding a moving van, they deliver portable lockers to your driveway.  You fill the boxes yourself, then they haul them off.)   Jamie 12:50, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Hmm... a good number of the results appear to be context ads as cached by Google. Also looks like there might be more than one company involved, and perhaps a reference or two to what might be describing the concept of having everything picked up on one end and dropped on the other, in an "end-to-end" fashion.  Withdrawing recommendation for now. Chris talk back 13:22, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete . Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages. --Ezeu 02:11, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Wavering between neutral and weak keep. The company is neither public, nor multi-national; however, AFAIK they basically invented a new service that similar existing service companies then had to match, which does seem somewhat noteworthy. Anyway, I have expanded the article (with external reference links) so people can get a better idea of what the company is really about. Obviously if it's kept it needs to move to Door To Door Storage. WP:CORP24.17.48.241 08:47, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Zoedrac. -- JJay 21:04, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.