Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dope Stars Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 23:10, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Dope Stars Inc.

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Old article which still remains devoid of verifiability, on band with no evidence of notability. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  23:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete: no widespread coverage. Nothing of independent note on Google WP:BAND. JamesBurns (talk) 05:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - the article makes claims of notability, such as being part of the SAW 4 soundtrack. Also, at the time of nomination, the article didn't have maintenance tags in it's recent history (e.g. past month) - while this isn't a reason to keep the article, a deletion request should generally appear soon after the maintenance tags were removed in order for it to be properly corrected. --Sigma 7 (talk) 05:09, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * comment It appears the article may have been a previous AfD that was kept. this is the code on the page. Also, there is a unreferenced tag, no need for a refimprove or citations tag. Sephiroth storm (talk) 15:26, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * This is the first AfD for this article that I can see. The code you mentioned is actually generated by afd1 tag itself. The date is the date of the posting of the AfD, not the date of any closing. The lack of apparent maintenance tags is only a side issue here as editing of the nominated article is permitted (except for renaming or redirecting) while the AfD continues. B.Wind (talk) 18:53, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 22:01, 28 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.