Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doreen Jacobi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mduvekot (talk • contribs) 12:18, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Doreen Jacobi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Largely unsourced BLP lacking independent, reliable sources. Possibly a slightly edited machine translation of de:Doreen_Jacobi Article has two sources, one is a press release, the other a corporate bio. Created by a blocked user. Mduvekot (talk) 22:40, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:30, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:30, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:30, 1 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete total lack of indepdent, reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:09, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Subject is being judged by the current state of this article, not on the notability of the subject. Good coverage such as exists. Has multiple leads and major roles in big productions. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:30, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * celebrity magazine cover . duffbeerforme (talk) 08:36, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I take then that it you can read German and understand that the article makes the opposite point: her acting career has not yet taken off and that her current role in a simple SAT1 detective series isn't enough to convince her to give up her day job. "Der heutige, recht simpel gestrickte Sat-1-Krimi jedenfalls lohnt den Abschied vom Unternehmertum noch nicht". Mduvekot (talk) 12:40, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Or people can read a machine translation of the article and see what it really says. Regardless, it's still coverage. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:11, 8 July 2017 (UTC) Keep WP:ENT #1 Agathoclea (talk) 20:36, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * has evidence of more coverage. Plus . duffbeerforme (talk) 05:15, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but that's multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Since she has no roles in any films, performances or other productions, that must be notable television shows. Which ones would those be exactly? Mduvekot (talk) 01:36, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The obvious one that stand out are HeliCops and a main character in a Tatort episode. (Tatort in Germany corresponds to Dr Who in Britain in notability terms). The others would need checking on the details and coverage of her involvement and most likely we would need to add a few more articles on those series here. Agathoclea (talk) 08:23, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Add a staring role in Problemzone Schwiegereltern to that. Agathoclea (talk) 08:36, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * "Since she has no roles in any films". Apart from the films she has roles in. Such as a significant role in Motown. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:25, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, I hadn't noticed that Motown has a cinematic release and has been reviewed. Thank you Agathoclea and Duffbeerforme for your contributions. I'll withdraw the nomination. Mduvekot (talk) 11:17, 14 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.