Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorian Phibian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Dorian Phibian

 * – ( View AfD View log )

BLP of an unsuccessful candidate for elected office. Does not pass WP:NPOL. Mccapra (talk) 03:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 03:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 03:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 03:53, 1 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: fails WP:NPOL by miles, and falls short of WP:GNG as well, despite having a funny story, there's not enough coverage that I found on a search to indicate notability. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 12:29, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I am not seeing enough here for WP:ARTIST. All I found in a search was this arrest for a hit and run.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:26, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. People do not get articles just for running as candidates in elections they did not win — the notability test at WP:NPOL is holding a notable political office, not just running for one — but this features neither credible evidence that he has preexisting notability for other reasons independent of the candidacy, nor enough reliable sourcing to make his candidacy markedly more special than the norm for unsuccessful candidates. Every candidate gets campaign coverage, so the existence of a small smattering of campaign coverage is not in and of itself enough. Bearcat (talk) 17:53, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete people who run for US house are not notable for that and he has no other claim to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:58, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.