Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doris Hofmann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus due to lack of participation (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:47, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Doris Hofmann

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article says she is a model (twice) but she never won a pageant. The only very short, very much a blog not a RS, says she was a runnerup in a local pageant and selected (appointed) to go to Miss Universe where she lost. In that event the girls are usually referred to by title not name, so with astonishingly little info and failing WP:NMODEL (pageant girls are a combination model/entertainer part of a stage show) we can't justify this article. Legacypac (talk) 08:49, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment 23 year old women (that was her age at Miss Universe competition) should be referred to as women and not "girls". Using the term girls for adult women is demeaning. We should not use it in Wikipedia, but properly show respect for such people. We need to stop disrespecting women.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:37, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Tell that to the industry      and here where Miss Universe call them girls itself  - I think a lot of things about these pageants are demeaning and sexist. Legacypac (talk) 20:38, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:40, 29 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.