Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorothy Cheney (scientist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 11:32, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Dorothy Cheney (scientist)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems like a run-of-the-mill researcher with no evidence of meeting WP:NACADEMIC criteria for inclusion. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:01, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 19:43, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 19:43, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 19:43, 13 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. Member of National Academy is an immediate pass of WP:PROF (unsurprisingly she also passes #C1), and nominating a member for deletion marks such a total lack of understanding of academic notability as to render the nominator unqualified for such edits. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:01, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep as per WP:PROF. Jmertel23 (talk) 20:44, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - WP:SNOWBALL Case, per WP:PROF.  VitalPower | talk  20:47, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Clear Keep with 32,000 cites on GS. I suggest consideration of a ban on this editor making further AfD nominations in this area. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:37, 13 May 2018 (UTC).
 * keep i got lost in reading her multiple achievements and the list of publications is impressive. Elisa.rolle (talk) 22:56, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep without any doubt, as a member of the National Academy of Sciences. I advise the nominator to refrain from any further ridiculous, disruptive and time-wasting AfD nominations. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  23:24, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. How ever could there be any doubt about this?--Ipigott (talk) 10:10, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Keep with a prediction of WP:SNOW. Minimal googling revealed article in NYT citing her (added to article) and a recent one in Smithsonian Magazine. Also, there should be a disambiguation page, because currently Dorothy Cheney goes to an article about a tennis player. Also, her husband and collaborator, also in PNAS, deserves an article of his own, IMO. HouseOfChange (talk) 02:16, 14 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.