Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dory Nason


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TOOSOON. No prejudice against recreation at some point in future. Tone 18:13, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Dory Nason

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A few mentions found in searches, won a minor award, fails WP:GNG, and she doesn't appear to meet any of the requirements of either WP:NSCHOLAR or WP:NAUTHOR.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:30, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 13:30, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 13:30, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 19:27, 8 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete as too soon. She has been publishing and will do more. The article is mistaken in her position. She is not yet an assistant professor; she is a senior instructor at UBC. StarryGrandma (talk) 21:16, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment I have corrected her academic position (I wonder if this was confusion between the US system and others?), even if it is WP:TOOSOON for an article! RebeccaGreen (talk) 00:06, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing suggests that Nason meets our inclusion criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:14, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unremarkable citation record in GS; insignificant Worldcat library holdings; apparently low-ranking faculty member; no notable awards or other distinctions relevant under WP:PROF. She was one of many contributors to one potentially significant publication, but I notice that the reference for that work being "groundbreaking" is her own faculty profile. I checked GS, Worldcat, Newspapers.com, Google and Google Books - all under both Dory and Dorothy - but did not see anything that would get her over the GNG bar. I note some close paraphrasing from her faculty page. Larry Hockett (Talk) 07:57, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, TOOSOON and Larry Hocket's rationale. --1l2l3k (talk) 19:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.