Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DotSUB


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  23:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

DotSUB

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I don't believe this company meets notability requirements. All the sources I could find were trivial mentions, a few user reviews, and what appear to be self-published profiles on sites like Crunchbase. I could find no in-depth, independent coverage. Squeakachu (talk) 18:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Technology. Squeakachu (talk) 18:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Software,  and New York.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:51, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. CastJared (talk) 03:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Support deletion. Insufficient sources to meet the notability criteria for companies per NCORP. MaxnaCarta (talk) 04:57, 4 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.