Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dotcrunk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. No Guru 22:56, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Dotcrunk
Tagged as repost but previous version appears to have been speedied, so technically a disputed speedy not a repost. As it stands this looks like a vanity article about a non-notable website. Just zis Guy you know? 09:39, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable web site. jmd
 * Delete as per nom, fails to meet WP:WEB guidelines. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 11:02, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:18, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I think that this article has more content than the site that it's about.  ergot 14:55, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--Conrad Devonshire 20:40, 5 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.