Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dotmusic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Cirt (talk) 04:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Dotmusic

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:WEB, no substantial coverage from reliable third-party sources. DiverseMentality (Discuss it)  17:38, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article lacks citations from reliable sources and that leads me to believe that it doesn't comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 20:40, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  18:54, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Following research, I've referenced six significant articles in the UK press over the site's life, which I believe meet the concerns relating to WP:CITE and WP:RS, hence WP:V. Notability should also be demonstrated. CJPargeter (talk) 15:31, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Having reviewed the work done by the above user, I think the relevant criteria are now met. Ac@osr (talk) 16:38, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.