Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dots(wargaing)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. G3, confirmed hoax. None of the listed reviews exist. Mgm|(talk) 10:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Dots(wargaing)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't verify that this game actually exists. The purported reviews don't seem to exist either. Therefore, I don't believe it passes WP:N. Wperdue (talk) 21:01, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a big fat hoax. Check out the publisher's official site. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 21:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Probably a hoax. Can't find any reliable sources. No evidence of being released. Would say speedy delete but not sure what category it would come under. Quantpole (talk) 22:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and above. I don't know what the speedy category is for deleting games played on paper. Drmies (talk) 22:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * There is none. Such a criterion would also lead to the deletion of Tic-Tac-Toe. - Mgm|(talk) 10:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. At best, non-notable game by a non-notable game company. - Vianello (Talk) 01:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.