Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dots and Motherhood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-11 04:14Z 

Dots and Motherhood

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Hoax or non-notable book. Article in support of Neva Bowers who keeps coming back under claims of various notability. Google hasn't heard of her or her book. Deprodded, can't think of a matching speedy deletion category. Weregerbil 09:57, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unsourced and as far as I see also unsourcable. Tikiwont 11:17, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete even if it does exist, it's not notable enough to appear anywhere on the interweb --Steve (Slf67)talk 11:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. If the author isn't notable enough for an article (and probably doesn't exist, see here), the book isn't either. ElinorD 17:50, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability. ShadowHalo 06:51, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.