Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dotty O'Dell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:16, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Dotty O'Dell

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:ENT. Winning the "Miss Photogenic" title via a local camera club and winning two other titles via a local fair is non-notable, even if it was reported by two sources.  Mbinebri  talk &larr; 21:45, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as she is a non-notable model. I couldn't find any sources, which discuss him in detail. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  16:09, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep O'Dell is one of a tradition of models photographed by the Glendale Valley Camera Club, which is still active photographing models. O'Dell is mentioned in 2 references by a leading source, the L.A. Times. Armbrust, your post about not being able to find references to her is not valid. A quick search of the internet is insufficient. I have more databases to draw from as I work at an academic institution. Also, O'Dell was a model of note in the late 1950s, winning additional titles aside from the one bestowed on her by the Glendale club.Robert (talk) 20:10, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable. Merely being mentioned in the LA Times does not confirm notability. There needs to be more in-depth coverage, to explain why this person merits a WP page. If Robert can provide such references, I'd be willing to re-consider, but right now there's nothing to suggest that this is a notable person. Jimmy Pitt   talk  22:19, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.