Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double-duty dollar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The article, while presently unsourced and stubby, nonetheless appears sourceable - consensus here is that the article can reasonably be improved to a good encyclopedic standard with some work. ~ mazca  talk 10:02, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Double-duty dollar

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article covers a non-notable phrase with very little possible encyclopaedic development. Neelix (talk) 18:10, 2 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: Very notable. Joe Chill (talk) 23:17, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * I'm with Joe Chill. That's a fairly decisive set of sources.  Keep.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  00:50, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets notability guidelines. But lots of work to be done. Netalarm   talk  05:44, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.