Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Double-sized IPA vowel chart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  08:57, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Double-sized IPA vowel chart

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Because I must sign in to finish the deletion process, I'll just state the reasons here: This should be a graphic. Thus, this belongs on Wikicommons. This page does nothing to describe the vowel chart. Already covered by IPA. If our customers (readers) are interested in knowing about vowels, they should go to the relevant articles. This article does not do anything in terms of listing information, data, or statistics about vowels, Thus, this article is unencyclopedic. --User:96.53.149.117 04:31, 22 December 2008 (UTC) 
 * I am completing this AfD started by an IP user. (The above are comments by the IP user on the article's talk page.) No recommendation on my part yet. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:19, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Move to Template:Large CSS IPA vowel chart or to Commons. - Richard Cavell (talk) 07:38, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. There already exists a template CSS IPA vowel chart with the same content. This article is linked to by the enlarge function of that template, but doesn't actually use larger fonts for anything, it just spaces the symbols farther apart. As such it seems pointless and redundant. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:02, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete redundant information. If someone really needs it large, they can simply reformat their computer. Tavix (talk) 06:38, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.